Men's Clothing Forums banner
21 - 40 of 54 Posts
H. Daroff and Sons made the Botany 500 suits but sold their factory a long time ago.
The new buyers let the company go bankrupt and production eventually ceased.
The Botany 500 name is licensed, but the Daroff factory is closed.
When the Daroff family owned the company, it was a very
highly regarded Philadelphia clothing manufacturer.
When Rod Serling was hosting his follow up to the Twilight Zone, "Night Gallery", he was clothed by a Philadelphia tailor, so that would make sense, that he was wearing Botany 500, into the early 70's.
 
Something that’s missing from this ancient thread is that Botany 500 paid for the clothes of many television stars and hosts but didn’t always directly provide the clothes. For example, Dick Van ****’s suits on his eponymous show were made by custom tailor Harry Cherry. Telly Savalas had the same arrangement for Kojak. If the clothes impressed you, they probably weren’t actually from Botany 500/Daroff.
 
Something that's missing from this ancient thread is that Botany 500 paid for the clothes of many television stars and hosts but didn't always directly provide the clothes. For example, Dick Van ****'s suits on his eponymous show were made by custom tailor Harry Cherry. Telly Savalas had the same arrangement for Kojak. If the clothes impressed you, they probably weren't actually from Botany 500/Daroff.
Then Serling was probably wearing Daroff. 👍🏻
 
Then Serling was probably wearing Daroff. 👍🏻
No, I was saying that Botany 500/Daroff sponsored wardrobes but didn't often provide them. These stars usually had custom wardrobes from bespoke tailors, not from ready-to-wear factories. When you see "furnished by Botany 500, tailored by Daroff" (or something to that effect) in the credits, it just means that they paid money to be in the credits and paid for the star's wardrobe. It doesn't mean that Daroff literally tailored the clothes for the star; it means that Daroff tailored Botany 500's clothes and Botany 500 paid to provide clothes. They just frequently didn't provide Botany 500 clothes. This was all cleverly branded and marketed to make us believe everyone on television wore Botany 500-branded clothes made at the Daroff factory, when in fact the stars all had much fancier wardrobes.
 
Something that's missing from this ancient thread is that Botany 500 paid for the clothes of many television stars and hosts but didn't always directly provide the clothes. For example, Dick Van ****'s suits on his eponymous show were made by custom tailor Harry Cherry. Telly Savalas had the same arrangement for Kojak. If the clothes impressed you, they probably weren't actually from Botany 500/Daroff.
That's a big deal. You would think the idea would be that a viewer would like the suit Van ****, Serling, etc. was wearing and would, then, go to the store trying to find it or something similar, but all under the Botany 500 brand.

It's an odd "branding" effort as you, a clothing manufacturer, are, effectively, paying someone to wear not your brand's clothes, but that kinda sorta give the impression that they are the clothes you make.
 
That's a big deal. You would think the idea would be that a viewer would like the suit Van ****, Serling, etc. was wearing and would, then, go to the store trying to find it or something similar, but all under the Botany 500 brand.

It's an odd "branding" effort as you, a clothing manufacturer, are, effectively, paying someone to wear not your brand's clothes, but that kinda sorta give the impression that they are the clothes you make.
People care about the name they see more than anything else. And few people would notice the difference between a suit they saw on a small black-and-white television and what they see in the store. I know people who think they can look like James Bond if they buy a suit from Brooks Brothers. We know that an American suit doesn't look like a British suit or a Tom Ford suit, but most men just count the number of buttons on the front and the colour. On an old television set both of those things were impossible!

Advertising was never an entirely honest practice. It's a field I work in. We word things in ways that are technically true and will tell people what they want to hear.
 
I'd love to know who made the suits that Craig Stevens wore in Peter Gunn. Just incredible.
His suits were officially furnished by Don Richards, but like Dick Van **** he wore suits by tailor Harry Cherry. The cut and button-one style are the same.

Here's an ad for Don Richards, with a photo of Stevens in a beautiful Harry Cherry suit.

Image
 
That's a big deal. You would think the idea would be that a viewer would like the suit Van ****, Serling, etc. was wearing and would, then, go to the store trying to find it or something similar, but all under the Botany 500 brand.

It's an odd "branding" effort as you, a clothing manufacturer, are, effectively, paying someone to wear not your brand's clothes, but that kinda sorta give the impression that they are the clothes you make.
A more extreme example has been seen in sports equipment, where a player has been sponsored by one manufacturer but prefers the equipment made by another, and so has the latter's equipment bearing the logos or other mark for the former. IIRC this would happen with tennis pros and their rackets, but it's also happened with track athletes and footwear.
 
I understand that I do not have the physique of Craig Stevens. Never did. Never will.

But, can someone explain to me why it is SO hard to explain to a tailor to "make me a suit that looks like that." I just don't understand why it is so hard to accomplish.
 
I understand that I do not have the physique of Craig Stevens. Never did. Never will.

But, can someone explain to me why it is SO hard to explain to a tailor to "make me a suit that looks like that." I just don't understand why it is so hard to accomplish.
It's not you, it's the tailor. I've seen short, heavyset men walk out of a Savile Row tailor looking like that. I don't know if there's any tailor in Los Angeles that still can make a suit like that. You'd have to go to London to get something that good.
 
Thank you - I appreciate the comment.

As an aside, the actor, Gale Gordon, who played Larry Tate on Bewitched was a heavy set man and yet his suits looked just amazing. That's sort of the point I was trying to make.
 
Thank you - I appreciate the comment.

As an aside, the actor, Gale Gordon, who played Larry Tate on Bewitched was a heavy set man and yet his suits looked just amazing. That's sort of the point I was trying to make.
Gale Gordon was on The Lucy Show and Here's Lucy, but he did indeed look great. David White played Larry Tate.
 
I would think H. Freeman or Empire could make you a suit like that now.

I always wondered-- what kind of a name is "Botany 500" anyway? Is there some sort of back story on that?
You need a world-class bespoke tailor to make a suit like that. High-end MTM could possibly do it too, but you're not getting that kind of suit for under $2,500.
 
My husband just found brand new Botany 500, tailored by Daroff suit in his grandfathers closet.
It even has label on it. Never worn.
Now we’re interested in it’s value.
Maybe anyone more advanced could help with info?
 
According to imdb.com, Kuppenheimer dressed Serling in '60/61, and Eagle dressed him from '61 to '64.
When he started hosting Night Gallery he was wearing Daroff, because he was required to send back the suits "provided by him by a Philadelphia clothier" after season 1 wrapped. (This from "Night Gallery an After Hours Tour") He went on to buy the suits, as NG was picked up for a second (and final 3rd) season.
 
My husband just found brand new Botany 500, tailored by Daroff suit in his grandfathers closet.
It even has label on it. Never worn.
Now we're interested in it's value.
Maybe anyone more advanced could help with info?
Probably $30-40. They're neither rare nor collectable. If it still looks good and fits your husband, it would most valuable if he can wear it.
 
21 - 40 of 54 Posts