Men's Clothing Forums banner

LL Bean vs Lands End

1 reading
83K views 44 replies 33 participants last post by  Tiger  
#1 ·
So in terms of affordable trad, with reasonably good quality, who do you leans towards of the two? Are there certain products you prefer from one to the other?

I think LL Bean has the better website, and it's easier to figure out WHAT exactly you want to buy (ie - they have buying guides for those unfamiliar with certain products). At the same time, Lands End offers cuffable chinos for less (and you don't have to make a special call to request those 1.75" cuffs), and you can return items to Sears.
 
#2 ·
Six of one...

All of LL Bean's dress shirts (and most of the others) are non-iron. Lands End offers tons more options in the shirt department.

I think Bean's "dress chinos" are better than the equivalent from LE.

LE doesn't have fly rods, not that I need another one. Once, out west with a damaged reel, I called, ordered and had delivered overnight a reel with a #6 weight double-taper line set up for a right-hand retrieve, something the local hook and bullet couldn't do, nor Orvis.

They both have excellent return policies.
 
#3 ·
bean/vs the Lands end

the fit on Beans shirts was always better-I will wear the non iron variety-(when gifted from mother in law) One could go on about the old days and Beans great faux Brooks or Press pocket ocbds..... tryi ng to make peace with the fact that as I get older these beloved items are a niche market item...perhaps best supplied by Mercer.

As I write this I am wearing a battered pair of late 80s /early 90s Bean chinos /w/the big tunnel style belt loops and well worn bluchers-my experience was longer lasting clothes + Bean trousers fit better.
The only LE shirt I ever liked was a pinpoint tennis collar w/ french cuffs c 1990-fairly generous in length/tails body which I didnt find to be the case in their hyde parks.
my pointless timeline and 2 cents I guess.
 
#4 ·
Interesting Question

I favor L L Bean for outdoorsy clothing -- their bluchers, wool shirts, chamois shirts, moccasins, Maine Hunting shoe, etc. They do seem to be straying from their roots and the quality of some of their items seems to me to be slipping rather badly. Notwithstanding my first bad telephone experience with L L Bean, I have always found them to be wonderful to do business with (especially with sporting goods). I used to like their khakis, but no longer. Now they are either teflon-coated or substantially worse quality than they were as recently as a couple of years ago.

Lands End, on the other hand, occasionally has had some very good quality clothing -- but one has to be a fairly careful shopper. I have been delighted with their (now discontinued) vintage khakis, a couple of lightweight wool sportcoats, a wonderful awning striped summer weight sport jacket, a Viyella shirt and two or three really high quality sweaters. Their customer service has been every bit as good as L L Bean. Something about small town Maine and Wisconsin people I suspect.

Both companies rely on keeping their prices as low as possible, which sometimes yields great bargains (e.g., polo shirts for roughly 20 bucks) but more often simply yields poor quality goods. At LE even more than at L L Bean, if the price looks too good to be true, you can probably assume the garment is of poor quality. But their higher price stuff is usually perfectly good quality -- comparable in quality to goods sold by others at often substantially higher prices.

One man's opinion (only).
 
#5 ·
Being from Maine, I have always preferred Bean. A little discouraging to see that almost none of their products are still made in Maine or even the U.S. Their return policy and customer service is second to none, anything with Bean's name on it is unconditionally guaranteed - even outlet purchases, seconds, etc. Their sales often feature amazing markdowns, especially at their outlets after Christmas. I also like that they sell hunting and fishing gear, are family owned, and support solid traditional charities like the Izaak Walton League, the Appalachain Trail Conference, Ducks Unlimited, etc. They are also much older than Land's End, located on the east coast, and not associated with Sears. Beans, as we say in Maine (note the lack of an apostrophe), was always trying to emulate the late Abercrombie & Fitch (RIP).
 
#9 ·
^I have an Old Town canoe (not from Bean). The other day I was horrified and annoyed to discover that someone - almost certainly my bonehead cousin - left the thing right side up with the paddles in it all winter. Lesser boats would have been destroyed, but not this thing. Tested it right away, A-OK.
 
#10 ·
LLB vs LE

I was much more a Lands' End fan back in the early and mid 80s, when the lines seemed a lot more focused on Traditional/Prep style; it seems that the 90s and the Al Gore Look have taken their toll.

Bean has changed, as well, but I can still find items, especially the dress chinos and Hunting Shoes, which do a fine job of filling a niche in my closet. Customer service is sterling in both cases.

hbs
 
#12 ·
I was much more a Lands' End fan back in the early and mid 80s, when the lines seemed a lot more focused on Traditional/Prep style; it seems that the 90s and the Al Gore Look have taken their toll.

Bean has changed, as well, but I can still find items, especially the dress chinos and Hunting Shoes, which do a fine job of filling a niche in my closet. Customer service is sterling in both cases.

hbs
This is pretty much my experience then and now as well. I like Bean's outerwear (barn and field coats) and Bean boots. LE is very good for basic, good value OCBDs, and I like both specifically because I can order casual shirts in Large-Tall which usually fit me very well.

One thing I really do miss, though, is LE d-ring belts. I had a collection of them in the 80's and wore them down to threads. But it took years to do so and they looked sharp for a long time.

Cordially,
Adrian Quay

PS

I also had a silly preference for getting packages and boxes from Freeport, Maine instead of Dodgeville, Wisconsin. The former always inspired me to think of hiking, walks and being in scenic places while the latter inspired nothing at all.
 
#13 ·
Illustrates another advantage of the Forum

This brings up the good point that there are no longer a few TNSIL sources. There are a lot of sources with only a few items from each source.

It seems that the raison d etre of the Forum is to help those interested, find the best sources for a few items.

It used to be possible to order from LLB a couple of times a year and get all you need there.

You might get Hyde Park gotta iron OCBD from Lands' End, and all would be well with the world.

Now, it seems like you get chamois shirts, Maine hunting boots, and blucher mocs from LLB.

However, you need Lands' End for merino wool and gabardine trousers, that seem to be the equivalent of BB trousers at about half the price, and that they will cuff at 1 3/4" without arguing about the cuffs.

You also need LE for OTC wool stretch sox, 3 pack for about the price of one from Byford, (thanks, Squire).

Khakis might be a jump ball, but you always need to check STP for Bills', first. Sort of like a scavenger hunt, but you really need them all.
 
#14 · (Edited)
I was much more a Lands' End fan back in the early and mid 80s, when the lines seemed a lot more focused on Traditional/Prep style; it seems that the 90s and the Al Gore Look have taken their toll.

Bean has changed, as well, but I can still find items, especially the dress chinos and Hunting Shoes, which do a fine job of filling a niche in my closet. Customer service is sterling in both cases.

hbs
I am curious. What do you mean by "the Al Gore Look."?

My own two cents is that the Hyde Park fills a gap for a rugged, OCBD at a VFM price. I don't really feel that way about anything from L.L. Bean; I never really liked those boots. Both make good stuff and occasionally come up with something great. LE sometimes marks this stuff down to next to nothing plus they have an Inlet in my hometown so I buy more from LE.
 
#18 ·
Glad to hear that LL Bean still makes something (only one thing?) in Maine.

I favor Lands' End Hyde Park Oxford due to its substantial feel, it's not quite the same as a BB OCBD, but it's a very good value.

LE has a fairly good selection of pinpoint oxford shirts in a variety of sizes/colors/patterns as well.

And if you're lucky you can get a few good deals in their overstocks section.
 
#19 ·
If you've ever compared the actual quality of the clothing of both you will go with LL. Bean without a second thought. If you're on a budget but like the clothes and you aren't big on quality, go with landsend. Same goes for if you are comparing ll.bean signature with landsend canvas.
 
#20 ·
I'm new to LL Bean. They recently started to sell directly to us Canadians and I love them. I wear my Field Jacket almost everyday, the mocs and boat shoes I recieved are excellent, a retro cardigan from Signature is really nice, Khakis are very good and we have bought a half dozen boat and totes this month for Xmas gifts.

LE, I see as low end catalog and Sears store filler.
 
#21 ·
Time was, I bought all my polos, etc from LL Bean, then they changed their polos so I moved on to Lands' End. Lands' End then changed their polos as well and now I don't know where to turn. Still love the pants cuffed to spec from Lands' End and of course their OCBDs, everything else lately has been hit & miss.

Brian
 
#22 ·
I'm an LL Bean guy all the way. I've been to the flagship store in Freeport and often order online. There is even an LL Bean outlet now in Central NY that I've been to
 
#23 ·
If you've ever compared the actual quality of the clothing of both you will go with LL. Bean without a second thought. If you're on a budget but like the clothes and you aren't big on quality, go with landsend.
LE, I see as low end catalog and Sears store filler.
I think these are grossly inaccurate and very unfair generalizations. For those new to both companies, please read the remarks made throughout this thread by other (more balanced) posters and you'll see much more impartial and helpful advice.
 
#24 ·
I think these are grossly inaccurate and very unfair generalizations. For those new to both companies, please read the remarks made throughout this thread by other (more balanced) posters and you'll see much more impartial and helpful advice.
No it isn't, I have first hand experience trying the clothes. You are certainly entitled to disagree though. LE is simply not in the high quality category material wise.
 
#25 ·
No it isn't, I have first hand experience trying the clothes. You are certainly entitled to disagree though. LE is simply not in the high quality category material wise.
...and I have been a customer of both LE and LLB - and many other retailers - for a couple of decades. I simply think your statement is far too harsh and general for it to be valuable to others.
 
#26 ·
The 'hand' of LE polos and turtlenecks is unsurpassed. Whether by Bean (whose shorts are my default choice) or anyone else, it matters not. Claiming that every item of one store is superior to every item of the other store is nonsense.