Men's Clothing Forums banner

Crockett & Jones 341 Last

23K views 7 replies 6 participants last post by  TKDKid  
#1 ·
I saw the new Sydney model in Plal's catalogue on a 341 last. I've never seen the 341 in person, from what little I've seen on the internet, it seems to be in the same fashion-foward vain as the 337 or 348 but not quite as pointy and slightly rounder. Is this the case, or is it really much more round and conservative?
 
#4 ·
#6 ·
Handgrade Hanover (337) vs Benchgrade Radstock (341):

https://img473.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cjhanoverradstockdr4.jpg

The 341 is a little bit shorter and a little bit wider than the 337. I think it's great and I like the look of a lot of the models made on this last, particularly the and .
TKD -- A fantastic picture. Thank you.

I love the 341 last but I have never seen the Radstock in person. Can you provide a few more photos of the Radstock, perhaps from different angles? I am curious how streamlined the shoe looks, and how close the welt is, given the Dainite sole.

Thank you!
 
#8 ·
Awesome! I was hoping you would respond, our own resident C&J expert!
:teacha:

Everything I know, I've picked up from AAAC and StyleForum. I just happened to focus on C&J rather than EG and JL.

I love the 341 last but I have never seen the Radstock in person. Can you provide a few more photos of the Radstock, perhaps from different angles? I am curious how streamlined the shoe looks, and how close the welt is, given the Dainite sole.
There's some pics , taken by someone else. I can take some pics of mine, but I'm not sure I can add anything new.

BTW, are those Lewin shoe trees I see ?
They're Shipton & Heneage's "Albion" shoe trees, which are probably the same as the ones offered by TM Lewin. They're a good fit on pretty much all of my shoes.