i cant make up my mind.. why have or not have one?
I've seen this done on shirts, but if you live in a very hot climate, you would long for a longer gauntlet and a button you could undo for the ventilation.What if the gauntlet was only half as long? That would serve the same purpose, and I think you could still get your hand through it.
You are so right. I wouldn't even mind a gauntlet longer by half the size of the original and a second button there. On warm days one could leave both buttons undone, as long as a jacket is worn.I've seen this done on shirts, but if you live in a very hot climate, you would long for a longer gauntlet and a button you could undo for the ventilation.
The purpose of the gauntlet's length has nothing to do with getting your hand through. It is there so that the cuff can be fully opened for ironing and to permit the proper rolling up of the sleeve for hand-washing.What if the gauntlet was only half as long? That would serve the same purpose, and I think you could still get your hand through it.
It is a placket with the traditional name of "sleeve gauntlet". This dates back to the days of armor when the gauntlet protected the hands and forearms during hand-to-hand combat.IMHO its properly a "placket". what do you think alexander?
It is. In this case it sounds like it was the firm's accountant.I have 3 RTW Charvet shirts, and none of them have the gauntlet button. I read somewhere that this was a considered decision on the maker's part. Can anyone confirm?
Some shi(r)tmakers in Italy brag about not needing a gauntlet button. None of these makers is any good.Alexander Kabbaz said:It is. In this case it sounds like it was the firm's accountant.![]()