Men's Clothing Forums banner
21 - 40 of 43 Posts
I've started wearing Aloha shirts and similarly designed short sleeve shirts since about last year when my already casual workplace decided to allow untucked shirts as long as they were square cut shirts, i.e. no tails which therefore must be kept tucked in. All in all I prefer the Tommy Bahama shirts I've thrifted. They seem to be strike a good balance between good design and colors without being too over the top. The problem is they generally tend to be silk and silk doesn't breath as well as cotton and linen. I also like the shirts from Cooke Street. Remember them? They used to be available from Costco many moons ago. I thrift these as well and I also like their designs, some of them are also the reverse types described above with the faded side sewn outward. I don't know if it's true or not but someone commenting on one article on Aloha shirts I read suggested that the Cooke Street shirts are actually a lower priced line from Tori Richard. For extra kitschy fun I often wear a puka shell necklace with these shirts too and have received many compliments on them, often from other Gen X'ers who remember the puka shell necklace from the 70's and early 80's. I've even seen a few around LA recently so maybe I'm starting a trend hahahahah.
 
Agreed on the Bahama shirts, I have several -- and I have not felt too warm in the silk variety. I also have some rayon shirts of this kind -- maybe they might be better than silk for breathability?

As for those necklaces, I have no idea what they are, LOL. I must be from the wrong generation!
I never quite understood the penchant of so many young men to wear puka shell necklaces, way back when, just as I do not know now the penchant of our grandsons' friends to wear single strands of pearls around their necks. Aw well, to each his/her own. LOL. ;)
 
I take it you mean your grandson's male friends, LOL. Perhaps it is an attempt to develop a unisex mode of dressing and accessorizing.

When I was growing up, it was not entirely uncommon to see men wearing a thin gold chain around their neck, and sometimes they even had a pendant! But I don't think I have ever seen a string of pearls around a lad's neck. When I came to the US in the mid-seventies, I saw many men wearing loudly-patterned shirts with most of the buttons undone, and they paired this with a small hubcap suspended from a chain around their necks. I thought that was truly bizarre.
 
I take it you mean your grandson's male friends, LOL. Perhaps it is an attempt to develop a unisex mode of dressing and accessorizing.

When I was growing up, it was not entirely uncommon to see men wearing a thin gold chain around their neck, and sometimes they even had a pendant! But I don't think I have ever seen a string of pearls around a lad's neck. When I came to the US in the mid-seventies, I saw many men wearing loudly-patterned shirts with most of the buttons undone, and they paired this with a small hubcap suspended from a chain around their necks. I thought that was truly bizarre.
It was!
 
I find, for me specifically, it's almost always easier visually to wear a camp shirt than an aloha shirt, since they seem to pretty much be the same thing other than the latter typically having a busier pattern.
 
View attachment 90105

Cowabunga! Surf's up Dudes.
The only surfing I ever did was body surfing -- a wild and almost zero-gravity experience before the sea slammed you into the sandy beach! But that was during my mis-spent youth...

Flanders, these fellows look rather like Native Hawaiians (or perhaps Pacific Islanders, generally) minus the Hawaiian shirts! Could these necklaces conceivably be Hawaiian in origin?
 
drpeter:

A little research found:
Puka shells are naturally occurring bead-like objects which can be found on some beaches in Hawaii. Each one is the beach-worn apex of a cone snail shell, a kind of seashell from a sea snail.

The work “puka” is Hawaiian in origin and means “hole.” Traditionally, puka shell necklaces were constructed from scavenged shell fragments that already had a naturally-occurring hole in them. A genuine puka shell necklace is sourced from the terminal helix of a cone snail. When the snail dies, the shell may eventually erode until the terminal helix breaks off. If the tip of the helix erodes further, it will leave a ring-shaped fragment of shell as a remnant. This natural bead was collected to create the original puka shell necklaces.

AND, David Cassidy, 70’s heartthrob, singer, and actor in The Partridge Family TV show made the necklace popular wearing white puka shell chokers throughout his run on The Partridge Family as well as on his international concert tours.
 
Thanks Andy. When I saw the word, it reminded me of the Hindi word pukka, which is also a loan word in colonial British English (along with hundreds of other words from assorted Indian languages). Pukka means correct, genuine, top-shelf, the real thing, etc. So maybe the puka shell got transformed into a pukka object for the seventies culture in our nation!
 
Thanks Andy. When I saw the word, it reminded me of the Hindi word pukka, which is also a loan word in colonial British English (along with hundreds of other words from assorted Indian languages). Pukka means correct, genuine, top-shelf, the real thing, etc. So maybe the puka shell got transformed into a pukka object for the seventies culture in our nation!
Like Khaki!
 
I never quite understood the penchant of so many young men to wear puka shell necklaces, way back when, just as I do not know now the penchant of our grandsons' friends to wear single strands of pearls around their necks. Aw well, to each his/her own. LOL. ;)
Yeah, the pearl necklace fad is odd. There are two young people at my work wearing them, one is a 30 year old woman who wears one almost everyday. It looks a bit odd because she wears the kinds of clothes her generation wears these days but the pearl necklace just seems odd and out of place with her attire but I honestly wouldn't know what she would otherwise chose to wear with them. I guess I just always have associated pearl necklaces with much older women like those over 60 and in more formal settings. The other co-worker who wears a pearl necklace is a young man but he actually can pull it off better than the young lady can because his fashion sense is already pretty outrageous i.e. he wouldn't be out of place as a new band member for the B-52's.
 
View attachment 90105

Cowabunga! Surf's up Dudes.
drpeter:

A little research found:
Puka shells are naturally occurring bead-like objects which can be found on some beaches in Hawaii. Each one is the beach-worn apex of a cone snail shell, a kind of seashell from a sea snail.

The work “puka” is Hawaiian in origin and means “hole.” Traditionally, puka shell necklaces were constructed from scavenged shell fragments that already had a naturally-occurring hole in them. A genuine puka shell necklace is sourced from the terminal helix of a cone snail. When the snail dies, the shell may eventually erode until the terminal helix breaks off. If the tip of the helix erodes further, it will leave a ring-shaped fragment of shell as a remnant. This natural bead was collected to create the original puka shell necklaces.

AND, David Cassidy, 70’s heartthrob, singer, and actor in The Partridge Family TV show made the necklace popular wearing white puka shell chokers throughout his run on The Partridge Family as well as on his international concert tours.
Yep, spot on Andy. Often what passes as puka shells these are the very thin shell fragments that almost look like little bits of egg shells. The genuine puka shells necklaces are as you describe, naturally occuring cone shaped. It's hard to tell in the picture above which these are but they appear to whole. Funny thing is that apparently they are sort of a collectors item from what I've been able to gather even if their owners can't quite bring themselves to wear them. Some of the examples I've seen on sites like Etsy are up for sale with asking prices going up to a few hundred dollars.
 
Yeah, the pearl necklace fad is odd. There are two young people at my work wearing them, one is a 30 year old woman who wears one almost everyday. It looks a bit odd because she wears the kinds of clothes her generation wears these days but the pearl necklace just seems odd and out of place with her attire but I honestly wouldn't know what she would otherwise chose to wear with them. I guess I just always have associated pearl necklaces with much older women like those over 60 and in more formal settings. The other co-worker who wears a pearl necklace is a young man but he actually can pull it off better than the young lady can because his fashion sense is already pretty outrageous i.e. he wouldn't be out of place as a new band member for the B-52's.
The classic look was for pearls (necklace, earrings) to be worn with formal dresses or evening gowns that were usually dark in colour. The simplicity and contrast actually echo rather nicely, the black and white combinations that are part of men's formal wear (black or white tie). Lifting it out of that context into casual settings may therefore seem all the more stark, LOL.

Your young colleagues at work may be experimenting with various items that have a tradition of one sort, but could be adapted to fit into a different, and newer set of practices. In a way, this process parallells, and is in keeping with, many other trends that have taken place historically -- finding new pairings and uses for things that have been around in a different context. Two examples: The practice of using military clothing in civilian contexts, which actually started in earnest after WWII with returning soldiers wearing the excellent khakis they still had on civvy street; and the earlier changes in women's clothing where, step by step, trousers, jeans, men's shirts and almost every article of male clothing became adapted to wear by women, in both casual and formal settings. The dramatic nature of some of these changes can only be realized when one looks at a long period of time. Late nineteenth century women's clothing was almost nothing like late twentieth century female attire -- in every detail, practically. Likewise, one would be hard pressed to find civilians wearing military jackets, shirts or trousers in the late nineteenth century.

A second aspect of these changes is the increasing informality in everyday wear through the second half of the last century. Much has been written about this, so I won't belabour the point, except to say that hats, suits and ties, which were all part of everyday wear sixty or seventy years ago, are pretty much on their way out as parts of daily attire. The increasing casualness of our clothing trends is a kind of open invitation to do away with traditional, fixed rules and practices, and perhaps recombine some things and adapt others, to create new styles and fashions. This trend started with small things like dropping or adding a single item (e.g. hats) from one's everyday wear. Now things have gone so far as to blur the distinctions between male and female attire -- for women, and more recently men, to adapt and wear the clothing of the opposite gender. This trend is much more pronounced in the case of women. Our society allows women to adopt male clothing far more readily than the opposite -- allowing men to adopt female clothing. But even that is changing too. What all this tells us about our views of the status of men and women in contemporary society and culture is something I'll reserve for another discussion, but let me say that doctoral dissertations have been written on changes far less sweeping!
 
The classic look was for pearls (necklace, earrings) to be worn with formal dresses or evening gowns that were usually dark in colour. The simplicity and contrast actually echo rather nicely, the black and white combinations that are part of men's formal wear (black or white tie). Lifting it out of that context into casual settings may therefore seem all the more stark, LOL.

Your young colleagues at work may be experimenting with various items that have a tradition of one sort, but could be adapted to fit into a different, and newer set of practices. In a way, this process paralells, and is in keeping with, many other trends that have taken place historically -- finding new pairings and uses for things that have been around in a different context. Two examples: The practice of using military clothing in civilian contexts, which actually started in earnest after WWII with returning soldiers wearing the excellent khakis they still had on civvy street; and the earlier changes in women's clothing where, step by step, trousers, jeans, men's shirts and almost every article of male clothing became adapted to wear by women, in both casual and formal settings. The dramatic nature of some of these changes can only be realized when one looks at a long period of time. Late nineteenth century women's clothing was almost nothing like late twentieth century female attire -- in every detail, practically. Likewise, one would be hard pressed to find civilians wearing military jackets, shirts or trousers in the late nineteenth century.

A second aspect of these changes is the increasing informality in everyday wear through the second half of the last century. Much has been written about this, so I won't belabour the point, except to say that hats, suits and ties, which were all part of everyday wear sixty or seventy years ago, are pretty much on their way out as parts of daily attire. The increasing casualness of our clothing trends is a kind of open invitation to do away with traditional, fixed rules and practices, and perhaps recombine some things and adapt others, to create new styles and fashions. This trend started with small things like dropping or adding a single item (e.g. hats) from one's everyday wear. Now things have gone so far as to blur the distinctions between male and female attire -- for women, and more recently men, to adapt and wear the clothing of the opposite gender. This trend is much more pronounced in the case of women. Our society allows women to adopt male clothing far more readily than the opposite -- allowing men to adopt female clothing. But even that is changing too. What all this tells us about our views of the status of men and women in contemporary society and culture is something I'll reserve for another discussion, but let me say that doctoral dissertations have been written on changes far less sweeping!
Excellent points all around. I almost never see a man wearing any type of hat other than a baseball cap and I can count on two hands the number of times I see a man wearing a tie over the course of a year. So when I do see someone in a hat or a tie it's hard not to take notice. I occasionally wear spectators and they do draw a lot of comments, mostly positive, especially from women but that's because they are so rare to see these days.
 
The classic look was for pearls (necklace, earrings) to be worn with formal dresses or evening gowns that were usually dark in colour. The simplicity and contrast actually echo rather nicely, the black and white combinations that are part of men's formal wear (black or white tie). Lifting it out of that context into casual settings may therefore seem all the more stark, LOL.

Your young colleagues at work may be experimenting with various items that have a tradition of one sort, but could be adapted to fit into a different, and newer set of practices. In a way, this process parallells, and is in keeping with, many other trends that have taken place historically -- finding new pairings and uses for things that have been around in a different context. Two examples: The practice of using military clothing in civilian contexts, which actually started in earnest after WWII with returning soldiers wearing the excellent khakis they still had on civvy street; and the earlier changes in women's clothing where, step by step, trousers, jeans, men's shirts and almost every article of male clothing became adapted to wear by women, in both casual and formal settings. The dramatic nature of some of these changes can only be realized when one looks at a long period of time. Late nineteenth century women's clothing was almost nothing like late twentieth century female attire -- in every detail, practically. Likewise, one would be hard pressed to find civilians wearing military jackets, shirts or trousers in the late nineteenth century.

A second aspect of these changes is the increasing informality in everyday wear through the second half of the last century. Much has been written about this, so I won't belabour the point, except to say that hats, suits and ties, which were all part of everyday wear sixty or seventy years ago, are pretty much on their way out as parts of daily attire. The increasing casualness of our clothing trends is a kind of open invitation to do away with traditional, fixed rules and practices, and perhaps recombine some things and adapt others, to create new styles and fashions. This trend started with small things like dropping or adding a single item (e.g. hats) from one's everyday wear. Now things have gone so far as to blur the distinctions between male and female attire -- for women, and more recently men, to adapt and wear the clothing of the opposite gender. This trend is much more pronounced in the case of women. Our society allows women to adopt male clothing far more readily than the opposite -- allowing men to adopt female clothing. But even that is changing too. What all this tells us about our views of the status of men and women in contemporary society and culture is something I'll reserve for another discussion, but let me say that doctoral dissertations have been written on changes far less sweeping!
Harry Styles is leading the way with much of this...and many of his suits are absolutely gorgeous.
 
21 - 40 of 43 Posts