Men's Clothing Forums banner
1 - 6 of 184 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,630 Posts
By three-piece suit am I to assume you don't mean a suit in three pieces, like the one I have after that run-in with the bear? I like what you've shown. The suit and everything about it. But not the shirt, tie nor pocket square. Not a fan of the kalidascope look. Nor of pocket squares in general, unless your nose runs a lot. Or you're a Mississippi river boat gambler, for which you'd also need a tiny moustache.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,630 Posts
They're not tight. They're slim cut. It's a look.
Your're eye sight's not what it used to be, right? Sorry to hear that. Squint then and look at the pants crotch upward. They're rip tiding. Fewer waves sunk the Pequod. That's not a Look. That's called lousy trousers.

No one's mentioned the jacket, the cork screw thing with the sleeve. How's it possible to get a sleeve twisted like that, get a little kid to yank on the cuff then run around in circles?

Sarge, not your best pic post here, but a good thread premise nonetheless.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
6,630 Posts
Still, handsome suits, all three.
No. The middle one's bad news. It needs shoulders. Not the suit, the guy wearing it. Amazing what decent anatomy will do for clothes.
...I love the idea of a contrasting button on the waistcoat.
Just a single one as you mention, or the others we can't see? And what else would you put there but contrasting buttons, gray? Nah. Besides, contrasting's not the proper adjective. Harmonizing is, and they do.

Thus ends your and Sarge's dose of dogmaticizing for the day.
 
1 - 6 of 184 Posts
Top