Hah, that's exactly what I just thought of.Reminds me of The Office episode where Michael Scott has pants with no rear pockets.
imho they look too feminine without back pockets.
i have made false pocket openings with no insides.
I agree, to me rear pockets signify men's pants. Their absence is in part perhaps to accentuate one of the curves on the female anatomy that men's clothes generally do not accentuate.Do not get pants without rear pockets or do as Alex does and add fake pockets. No pockets = women's pants.
Enjoy your new suit.
AgreePants with no back pockets would look too much like women's pants for my liking. While I don't think that most men pay much attention to the details of other men's clothing, I do believe that this would be noticed and would probably generate a few chuckles behind your back. But if knowing this doesn't bother you then it's really no one else's business.