Hi I am new but reading the forum helped me make the leap from $150 shoes to some "real shoes" -- and I decided that I might as well go whole hog, or rather shell cordovan due to inspiration from this site. So I wanted to thank everyone. I pretty much only wear black shoes (architect...lots of black), but the idea of the cordovan color on the shell cordovan appealed to me as it would patina and wear. I normally hate burgundy shoes as they seem like "old lawyer" shoes rather than architects shoes. But the color in shell seems right however, a different thing entirely due to the nature of the material. Architecturally analogous to the difference between real rosewood or mahogany and cheap oak or pine stained dark to look like mahogany. I also knew I wanted a minimalist shoe with a significant sole and so the plain toe blucher. With that in mind, I started my quest first at the AE store and then at a local retailer that carries Alden. I actually bought both and returned one--the AE.
I know there have be threads about this before, though they seem a couple years old, so I would like to add my observations that the Alden seems markedly superior to the AE.
FIT: The Alden was far more comfortable from the first second (the most comfortable new shoe I have ever put on); the AE Leeds was tight around the ball of the foot or gapped around the ankle depending on size. I know that fit will vary on each persons foot however.
STYLE: Again, some subjectivity but I would argue that the Alden is more elegant, even through it uses a chunkier, wider last. The eyelet tabs are thiner and better shaped and proportioned to the whole, giving more elegance to the overall shoe. When the show is this simple, such things make a huge difference. At least on my 10 1/2 size feet (normally 11) the curve from the toe to the arch of the foot is more pronounced and sweeping, giving the overall form greater elegance whether with narrow jeans or suit trousers. The Alden stitching on the welt is colored to pick up the cordovan tone, which is a very nice detail. The AE's shape lacked definition or refinement even though it is similar in principle of course.
MATERIAL & COLOR: I know the cordovan comes from the same source. But if I had not read that I am not sure I would have believed it.
The AE was really more brown than I expected, and matte in finish (and while color can I know vary, it was roughly the same on the three pairs I tried on). Not much depth to the color or finish. The eyelet panel on one shoe was a noticeably different shade than the last, or the other panel. The Alden is a beautiful deeper plum/oxblood/cherry brown that shifts in different light and out of the box was highly gloss with depth in the color. every panel was perfectly matched. It seemed both more refined and "tougher." The cordovan on the Alden is really pretty amazing even after two days of wear, with the color shifting as the shell gets its waves. I would have sworn the shoes had two different grades of material, though I know they are the same from the source as are apparently the same. I understand Alden might die their hides again and in any case, they seem to finish them differently and to my eye to a higher level.
CONSTRUCTION & FINISH: AE: I found numerous loose ends on the stitching, a slightly rough beveling on the inside on one tongue, and the edge dressing on the sole was not that even. There seemed to be a couple holes the last on each shoe with missing stitching. To be honest, the finish of the leather and in the construction just did not seem up to par for the cost. The Alden....perfect. Or as perfect as bench made shoe should be. There is a noticeable and quantum leap in the attention to detail in the Alden compared to the AE. You feel this as well when it is on. That steel shank creates a sense of authority and stability.
So in sum: the Alden is expensive indeed but it exudes quality. To me it is not traditional but a throughly modern shoe. As an architect, I would say it is the Eames Chair of Shoes.
The AE is slightly less expensive but because of the issues above actually seems less a value. Maybe it was just a weird pair, but I tried on a few in the store looking for the right size, and none of them were finished as well as any of the Aldens I saw or tried. And in a close comparison at home there was no contest.
Now of course, I am a total newb. But the Alden was clearly an amazing shoe. Now. hopefully it will last decades (or at least 6 times longer than the Kenneth Coles that drop off a cliff in appearance after one year and seem impossible to resole properly anyway) to justify the expense beyond the aesthetic refinement.
One thing: anyway you think I can get away with wearing these with black suits or pants?
Okay, time to go sit in my eames chair in my alders and watch Madmen...
I know there have be threads about this before, though they seem a couple years old, so I would like to add my observations that the Alden seems markedly superior to the AE.
FIT: The Alden was far more comfortable from the first second (the most comfortable new shoe I have ever put on); the AE Leeds was tight around the ball of the foot or gapped around the ankle depending on size. I know that fit will vary on each persons foot however.
STYLE: Again, some subjectivity but I would argue that the Alden is more elegant, even through it uses a chunkier, wider last. The eyelet tabs are thiner and better shaped and proportioned to the whole, giving more elegance to the overall shoe. When the show is this simple, such things make a huge difference. At least on my 10 1/2 size feet (normally 11) the curve from the toe to the arch of the foot is more pronounced and sweeping, giving the overall form greater elegance whether with narrow jeans or suit trousers. The Alden stitching on the welt is colored to pick up the cordovan tone, which is a very nice detail. The AE's shape lacked definition or refinement even though it is similar in principle of course.
MATERIAL & COLOR: I know the cordovan comes from the same source. But if I had not read that I am not sure I would have believed it.
The AE was really more brown than I expected, and matte in finish (and while color can I know vary, it was roughly the same on the three pairs I tried on). Not much depth to the color or finish. The eyelet panel on one shoe was a noticeably different shade than the last, or the other panel. The Alden is a beautiful deeper plum/oxblood/cherry brown that shifts in different light and out of the box was highly gloss with depth in the color. every panel was perfectly matched. It seemed both more refined and "tougher." The cordovan on the Alden is really pretty amazing even after two days of wear, with the color shifting as the shell gets its waves. I would have sworn the shoes had two different grades of material, though I know they are the same from the source as are apparently the same. I understand Alden might die their hides again and in any case, they seem to finish them differently and to my eye to a higher level.
CONSTRUCTION & FINISH: AE: I found numerous loose ends on the stitching, a slightly rough beveling on the inside on one tongue, and the edge dressing on the sole was not that even. There seemed to be a couple holes the last on each shoe with missing stitching. To be honest, the finish of the leather and in the construction just did not seem up to par for the cost. The Alden....perfect. Or as perfect as bench made shoe should be. There is a noticeable and quantum leap in the attention to detail in the Alden compared to the AE. You feel this as well when it is on. That steel shank creates a sense of authority and stability.
So in sum: the Alden is expensive indeed but it exudes quality. To me it is not traditional but a throughly modern shoe. As an architect, I would say it is the Eames Chair of Shoes.
The AE is slightly less expensive but because of the issues above actually seems less a value. Maybe it was just a weird pair, but I tried on a few in the store looking for the right size, and none of them were finished as well as any of the Aldens I saw or tried. And in a close comparison at home there was no contest.
Now of course, I am a total newb. But the Alden was clearly an amazing shoe. Now. hopefully it will last decades (or at least 6 times longer than the Kenneth Coles that drop off a cliff in appearance after one year and seem impossible to resole properly anyway) to justify the expense beyond the aesthetic refinement.
One thing: anyway you think I can get away with wearing these with black suits or pants?
Okay, time to go sit in my eames chair in my alders and watch Madmen...