Hello everyone,
I am just about ready to purchase my first (and likely only) Barbour jacket. My preference is for a Beaufort. I anticipate wearing it quite frequently, but my "justification" is being able to wear it as a relatively lightweight overcoat when wearing a sport coat to work (I am a high school teacher). In reality, I anticipate that it will also become the jacket that I wear most often during the fall and spring - when it is not too cold.
Yesterday I spent some time at O'Connell's comparing the two currently available Beaufort models - the "original" Beaufort (sage) and the "classic" Beaufort (with the Sylkoil finish) in olive. At the store, my opinion was that the classic was the more appealing jacket. I liked the color, the finish, and the lining more than that of the original. In particular, I found the wax finish of the original to be too shiny for my taste.
Since I need to go back to O'Connell's next week to pick up a sport coat, I decided to put off my purchase for a bit so that I could do some research. I've been reading through the various threads on the subject. The majority of the discussions comparing these topics (at least the ones that I found) took place a few years ago. At that time, the consensus seemed to be that the "classic" finish was more attractive initially, but that the "original" wax finish would, in time, develop a more attractive patina than the classic. I recall reading somewhere that, in time, the "Classic" jacket would develop a more "country-like" look, versus the original, which would remain more appropriate for the city.
I am curious to hear from any long-term owners of the classic Beaufort model who would be willing to give a long-term review of their jacket. I trust that both the original and classic versions will hold-up well mechanically. My main concerns are aesthetic. Specifically, are folks who have owned classic Beauforts happy with the way that the classic finish has worn over time?
If possible, I would love to see some pictures!
Thanks for your help.
Sean
I am just about ready to purchase my first (and likely only) Barbour jacket. My preference is for a Beaufort. I anticipate wearing it quite frequently, but my "justification" is being able to wear it as a relatively lightweight overcoat when wearing a sport coat to work (I am a high school teacher). In reality, I anticipate that it will also become the jacket that I wear most often during the fall and spring - when it is not too cold.
Yesterday I spent some time at O'Connell's comparing the two currently available Beaufort models - the "original" Beaufort (sage) and the "classic" Beaufort (with the Sylkoil finish) in olive. At the store, my opinion was that the classic was the more appealing jacket. I liked the color, the finish, and the lining more than that of the original. In particular, I found the wax finish of the original to be too shiny for my taste.
Since I need to go back to O'Connell's next week to pick up a sport coat, I decided to put off my purchase for a bit so that I could do some research. I've been reading through the various threads on the subject. The majority of the discussions comparing these topics (at least the ones that I found) took place a few years ago. At that time, the consensus seemed to be that the "classic" finish was more attractive initially, but that the "original" wax finish would, in time, develop a more attractive patina than the classic. I recall reading somewhere that, in time, the "Classic" jacket would develop a more "country-like" look, versus the original, which would remain more appropriate for the city.
I am curious to hear from any long-term owners of the classic Beaufort model who would be willing to give a long-term review of their jacket. I trust that both the original and classic versions will hold-up well mechanically. My main concerns are aesthetic. Specifically, are folks who have owned classic Beauforts happy with the way that the classic finish has worn over time?
If possible, I would love to see some pictures!
Thanks for your help.
Sean