Joined
·
178 Posts
What do you think of leaving the last cuff button unbuttoned?
+1.Why would you do that, other than to unnecessarily show off surgeon's cuffs, which is tacky?
I was thinking of jackets.I think it can work on specific shirt cuff designs, but I don't like it on jacket cuffs.
Even worse.I can recall only a single instance of ever even noticing surgeon's cuffs on someone's jacket. That was only because the buttonhole closest to the cuff was a different color.
It's a douchey look.Oh my gosh, everyone to the fainting couches! You can cut the priggishness with a knife! Who makes these rules, anyway? and why bother with them?
Let's take a breath...
It's neither sophisticated nor gauche.
You go through the bother of having the things made so they can be unbuttoned, so just go ahead and have some fun with it if you want. Buttoned, unbuttoned, it's neither in service of humanity nor crime against.
You don the jacket. "I think I'll have one of my cuffs undone!" you say to yourself, feeling a bit rakish this morning. *Snap* "Ho ho! A bit of fun, this!" And out the door you go.
A handful of observant people will notice. Some will have opinions on it. No one will leap into your arms, confessing their love. None will stalk you into an alley, knife in hand, bent on "correcting" the problem.
If someone asks, you say "yeah, it's called a surgeon's cuff? I thought it would be a neat detail when I had the jacket made. Hmmm? Yes, I like it, a better fit, you know?... actually much less than I expected! Of course I can recommend the tailor, hold on..."
See? Not so bad.
DH
How so?It's a douchey look.
Seems like the OP has a question and wants to know our opinion so I don't feel that "do what you please" is a great response to someone who's asking what others think. The man asked us a question so lets answer it.How so?
It's barely noticeable (versus, say, "popped" collars, which I would concede is "douchey".)
At worst, it might be condemned as Trying To Hard or faux-sprezz (or whatever kind of phrase one wants to coin.) The obvious solution would simply be to say "no one should ever get functioning buttonholes", because if you're not using them, why bother with the added expense?
DH
PS. Attached - photo of the famously douchey Jean Cocteau?
View attachment 39653
Nope. Not a good look there either.How so?
It's barely noticeable (versus, say, "popped" collars, which I would concede is "douchey".)
At worst, it might be condemned as Trying To Hard or faux-sprezz (or whatever kind of phrase one wants to coin.) The obvious solution would simply be to say "no one should ever get functioning buttonholes", because if you're not using them, why bother with the added expense?
DH
PS. Attached - photo of the famously douchey Jean Cocteau?
View attachment 39653
This is how I see it. I don't find it inappropriate or offensive in any way, much less a definitive indicator of douchebaggery.Let's take a breath...
It's neither sophisticated nor gauche.
You go through the bother of having the things made so they can be unbuttoned, so just go ahead and have some fun with it if you want. Buttoned, unbuttoned, it's neither in service of humanity nor crime against.
You don the jacket. "I think I'll have one of my cuffs undone!" you say to yourself, feeling a bit rakish this morning. *Snap* "Ho ho! A bit of fun, this!" And out the door you go.
A handful of observant people will notice. Some will have opinions on it. No one will leap into your arms, confessing their love. None will stalk you into an alley, knife in hand, bent on "correcting" the problem.
If someone asks, you say "yeah, it's called a surgeon's cuff? I thought it would be a neat detail when I had the jacket made. Hmmm? Yes, I like it, a better fit, you know?... actually much less than I expected! Of course I can recommend the tailor, hold on..."
See? Not so bad.
DH
Agree.This is how I see it. I don't find it inappropriate or offensive in any way, much less a definitive indicator of douchebaggery.