English shoes and Italian Suits for this guy.
Not many on here are genuine Savile Row customers. It is expensive.I have always believed that English suits cuts simply cannot be beaten. I get my suits from Savile Row and have done since I left school a long, long time ago!
But why is it that the Italian suit has taken the mainsteam popularity over the traditional English suit. To me, the English suit cut requires significantly more skill to build.
Would you go Italian or would you stay Savile Row?
Thanks,
Suit Lover
My favourite shirtmaker OTR. Can't quite stretch to Budd or Emma Willis.At the moment I am wearing my Turnbull and Asser shirt. I find that their traditional fits are really great and the quality of the shirt seems to be unmatched.
You mean European as in continental European, right?And, BTW, I prefer American shoes. I find the European designs compatible only with the kind of skinny boy suits so beloved by GQ.
They are not an old Savile Row house, no. They do MTM suits, and have a high end option (starting at about £850) that is fully-basted. I've heard good reports, though - might give them a try soon.Cad and Dandy is not a true Savile Row tailor as far as I am aware.
You are so correct. Another case is point, for those interested in hi fi, is the history of QUAD. Peter Walker, the founder, was knighted for his accomplishments. The sound of QUAD gear is amazing given its price point. Yet, after the company was sold a number of times in the last 20 years, all manufacturing is now in China. Again, how did this happen? Post #12 has many of the answers.I think it's a stretch to say that Cad and the Dandy are a 'Savile Row tailor'... despite their showroom on Savile Row...
And Thomas Pink are certainly not a 'traditional' Jermyn Street shirtmaker
In answer to your question, I think British apparel companies have been very slow to capitalise on their rich inheritance of style and expertise compared to the Italians and make a product which is high-quality and yet has mass market potential. In fact, the Italians have proved very adept at taking elements of traditional British styling and selling it back to the Anglo-Saxon consumer! There are probably a number of reasons for this : including the renowned snobbishness and inflexibility to the forces of change on Savile Row (just read Richard Anderson's book on that)and the general failures in British management in manufacturing and exports since WWII, poor investment etc.
I have a number of off the rack trousers from Turnbull & Asser that have forward pleats. I got those a few years ago. Their suits also had forward pleats. I believe they still do, at least the ones sold in New York. Before they had reverse-pleat trousers with their suits.Also, as far as I know, NO British suit manufacturer sells a suit that has trousers with forward pleats. How did such an absurdity happen? Another case in point: my tailor recently got in a book of Holland & Sherry moleskin and corduroy fabrics. I inquired as to his price for a pair of moleskins: $500.00, due in large part to the cost of the fabric. I can get excellent moleskins elsehere for less than 1/3 of that.
Good to know. Thank you.I have a number of off the rack trousers from Turnbull & Asser that have forward pleats. I got those a few years ago. Their suits also had forward pleats. I believe they still do, at least the ones sold in New York. Before they had reverse-pleat trousers with their suits.
The Italians have long been masters at passing off items made in the Far East or Indian subcontinent as Made in Italy. The relaxed attitude to such practices in Italy has always been part of its charm.What the Italians have to offer, again in my opinion, is that they can deliver a great product at a competitive price, which is something that the Brits really cannot get a handle on.