I sell a lot of shell cordovan shoes on here and eBay. IMHO, the main advantage of cordovan is its durability. It scracthes, but a quick brushing & polishing will take almost anything out. Also, it shines very easily. The status is an advantage to some
On a side note, the Randolph in cordovan is notorious for tearing right where the strap meets the body of the shoe. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen this model torn. If you don't have an opportunity to try it on before buying, I wouldn't buy it. I think the tearing occurs when the vamp is too low for a particular person's foot.
If you are open to suggestions, the LHS is a better made loafer than the full strap by Alden. Beside the cosmetic differences (and the fact that I have a brand new pair for sale in the Trade exchange :icon_smile_wink
, I think the LHS is better constructed. I also think that it looks better after some wear & creasing. I think it is more important to look at how a shell cordovan shoe looks with creases than brand new.
On a side note, the Randolph in cordovan is notorious for tearing right where the strap meets the body of the shoe. I cannot tell you how many times I have seen this model torn. If you don't have an opportunity to try it on before buying, I wouldn't buy it. I think the tearing occurs when the vamp is too low for a particular person's foot.
If you are open to suggestions, the LHS is a better made loafer than the full strap by Alden. Beside the cosmetic differences (and the fact that I have a brand new pair for sale in the Trade exchange :icon_smile_wink
, I think the LHS is better constructed. I also think that it looks better after some wear & creasing. I think it is more important to look at how a shell cordovan shoe looks with creases than brand new.
