Joined
·
3,720 Posts
Oops, the thread title should say "Ivy League Look." Anyway:
The late Bob Hallman was a reporter for the Gastonia [North Carolina] Gazette. He also loved clothes. In June 1967, he wrote a series of three feature articles about the origin and spread of the Ivy League Look. Here's Part I, published on June 4, 1967. Parts II and III will follow ASAP.
A few things before I present the article:
(a) Note that the headline contains a very early use (in the popular press, anyway) of the word "Trad"--not merely as a shortened form of "traditional," but as a shortened way of referring specifically to "traditional Ivy League clothing." I learned from Christian Chensvold's Ivy Style blog that in the early 1960s, a menswear store called "The Trad Shop" served the Cornell University community. That store advertised in local newspapers, of course. But aside from references to The Trad Store, the headline below might be not just an early, but possibly the first use of "Trad" (as we know it) in a mass-market newspaper.
(b) In the article, Mr. Hallman emphasizes that Ivy Style was created by and for the sons of America's elite classes. Although to us here in 2018 he seems to be stating the obvious, Mr. Hallman's facts could have been news to his readers in 1967. After all, by 1967, Ivy or Ivy-inspired clothing--especially in the Carolinas--was simply what a lot of men wore and took for granted. Surrounded by the style, people in the 1960s would not have necessarily associated it with America's aristocracy.
(c) It's ironic that it was in 1967 that Mr. Hallman wrote of the enduring presence of Ivy League clothes. By consensus, that year is regarded as the last year of Ivy's "heyday." Styles didn't change overnight--this was especially true in the Carolinas--and Ivy style hasn't disappeared (completely). But big style changes were about to happen. The year 1967 was a turning point. Of course, Mr. Hallman could not have known that at the time.
(d) I am not presenting this and the other two articles as the definitive history of the Ivy League look. Rather, they comprise one particularly astute and interested reporter's interpretation of that history. Even if you disagree with his conclusions, the articles are fun to read.
(e) In the second-to-last paragraph, Mr. Hallman mentions that the Ivy look has built up "a hard core of dedicates." Does that phrase remind you of anyone you know?
And now the article:
"The Story of Ivy: Part I
"Trad's History is Rebellion
"EDITOR'S NOTE: Traditional or Ivy League clothes are worn more in the South today than in any other styling. Young men are adamant in their preference for it. Why? What kind of hold does it have upon students and young executives? In this, the first of a series, traditional styling will be explored from its beginning to the present--and how it got where it is.
"By BOB HALLMAN
"First Of A Series
"Some call it Ivy League.
"Others call it Traditional.
"BUT BY ANY other name soft-shoulder clothing--the kind that has virtually become a campus uniform in the South--is still Natural Shoulder styling.
"Look about and see the Traditional Man--the student says he's one; young executives make the same claim. Those who make and sell it add a third dimension: the high school youth who isn't quite certain how he wants to dress since he continually follows the whims of the day.
"TRUE TO ITS name, Natural Shoulder Clothing originated in that cluster of Norheastern schools so proudly proclaimed the Ivy League. And like some fringy fads of the present, it too was the product of unrest and rebellion. But unlike the novelty hit of the day, often expended and discarded like a paper cup, having exhausted its sales potential, Traditional styling has lasted almost four decades with minor innovations, now more solidly entrenched than ever in the Southeast.
"Followers attribute its longstanding success to a clean and uncluttered look, maintained in the face of broadside challenges. Others say it just happened to be the best idea of the time, conducive to the climate, atmosphere, and thinking of the New South. A third view points to the fact that it was created and nursed along by young men who styled and restyled it themselves.
"There's validity in all three arguments, for the fundamental characteristics of Traditional Clothing is simple standardization. Not only the form but the details are stock items, beginning with the lean and young look that embodies straight lines, unpadded shoulders, and a soft, relaxed shaping.
"The basic silhouette remains the same and in the purest sense it is accessorized with oxford cloth shirts that have soft rolling collars and long points, three-inch repp ties and more often than not wingtip brogue shoes or moc-toe slip-ons.
"THAT'S TRADITIONAL styling today, not always this prescribed formula that has become the stock-in-trade for young Americans.
"The look, basically its present form, originated shortly after World War I in New England colleges and universities by young men of wealth, who wanted to shake themselves free of "college boy" suits which had gravitated from overpadded styles in the 1880s to the skin-tight jobs in the early 1900s.
"CONTRARY to many popular misconceptions of the day, it was not the masses, the middle-income group or the lower-end students who made this style go. It took money to bring it home, make it, and wear it. After that it became another story.
"So, there is no real reason to believe that those affluent Ivy collegians who used their dads' bankrolls to go abroad for the summer with the varsity crews and tennis teams to compete against Oxford and Cambridge had anything in mind other than a good time. Bringing back styling ideas for new clothes was certainly not a matter of grave concern.
"HOWEVER, one look at what British men were wearing stirred an excitement within themselves that never quite quenched itself. The yen to be different, look different and having the money to do it sowed the seed that gradually evolved into Ivy League styling.
"Over there the English were wearing short two-button jackets with rounded fronts, broad shoulders and as often as not peaked lapels. (Rather different for the times.) This, combined with elephantine "Oxford Bags" (trousers that were 21 to 23 inches wide), plus-six knickers (so-called because the drape of the leg extended fully six inches below the knee), set the stage for the beginning of Traditional clothing in this country.
"AND IT was various interpretations of the English Look that gradually became a single look. Those coming home brought foreign clothes with them, took them to tailors, pulled them apart then sewed them back into an American adaptation. The look was styled, restyled, modified, and remodified and eventually, probably as much due to the
Depression as anything else, worked its way into a version of the Traditional Look as it is known today.
"Amazingly enough, once an identity was established, it held firm. Unlike some of its counterparts, Ivy never yielded to a passing fancy. Despite efforts to debase, abort, and bastardize it, Ivy League styling remains the most-wanted, most-worn, and most talked-about look in the land.
"THIS IS NOT to infer the soft-shoulder look has always enjoyed unprecedented popularity. It hasn't. It came from the families of the rich, which ruled out the masses immediately, thereby making its rise more slowly than would be the case today. But by the same token it was building a hard core of dedicates who would not compromise for less.
"As time tells, its biggest stronghold during the past 20 years has been in the Carolinas, often called "The Island of Natural Shoulder History," largely because pockets of Traditional fanciers remained there during periods of quick-changing styles wars.
"NEXT: Traditional Develops Despite Obstacles"
Quoted material used under a Creative Commons non-commercial license.
To be continued....
The late Bob Hallman was a reporter for the Gastonia [North Carolina] Gazette. He also loved clothes. In June 1967, he wrote a series of three feature articles about the origin and spread of the Ivy League Look. Here's Part I, published on June 4, 1967. Parts II and III will follow ASAP.
A few things before I present the article:
(a) Note that the headline contains a very early use (in the popular press, anyway) of the word "Trad"--not merely as a shortened form of "traditional," but as a shortened way of referring specifically to "traditional Ivy League clothing." I learned from Christian Chensvold's Ivy Style blog that in the early 1960s, a menswear store called "The Trad Shop" served the Cornell University community. That store advertised in local newspapers, of course. But aside from references to The Trad Store, the headline below might be not just an early, but possibly the first use of "Trad" (as we know it) in a mass-market newspaper.
(b) In the article, Mr. Hallman emphasizes that Ivy Style was created by and for the sons of America's elite classes. Although to us here in 2018 he seems to be stating the obvious, Mr. Hallman's facts could have been news to his readers in 1967. After all, by 1967, Ivy or Ivy-inspired clothing--especially in the Carolinas--was simply what a lot of men wore and took for granted. Surrounded by the style, people in the 1960s would not have necessarily associated it with America's aristocracy.
(c) It's ironic that it was in 1967 that Mr. Hallman wrote of the enduring presence of Ivy League clothes. By consensus, that year is regarded as the last year of Ivy's "heyday." Styles didn't change overnight--this was especially true in the Carolinas--and Ivy style hasn't disappeared (completely). But big style changes were about to happen. The year 1967 was a turning point. Of course, Mr. Hallman could not have known that at the time.
(d) I am not presenting this and the other two articles as the definitive history of the Ivy League look. Rather, they comprise one particularly astute and interested reporter's interpretation of that history. Even if you disagree with his conclusions, the articles are fun to read.
(e) In the second-to-last paragraph, Mr. Hallman mentions that the Ivy look has built up "a hard core of dedicates." Does that phrase remind you of anyone you know?
And now the article:
"The Story of Ivy: Part I
"Trad's History is Rebellion
"EDITOR'S NOTE: Traditional or Ivy League clothes are worn more in the South today than in any other styling. Young men are adamant in their preference for it. Why? What kind of hold does it have upon students and young executives? In this, the first of a series, traditional styling will be explored from its beginning to the present--and how it got where it is.
"By BOB HALLMAN
"First Of A Series
"Some call it Ivy League.
"Others call it Traditional.
"BUT BY ANY other name soft-shoulder clothing--the kind that has virtually become a campus uniform in the South--is still Natural Shoulder styling.
"Look about and see the Traditional Man--the student says he's one; young executives make the same claim. Those who make and sell it add a third dimension: the high school youth who isn't quite certain how he wants to dress since he continually follows the whims of the day.
"TRUE TO ITS name, Natural Shoulder Clothing originated in that cluster of Norheastern schools so proudly proclaimed the Ivy League. And like some fringy fads of the present, it too was the product of unrest and rebellion. But unlike the novelty hit of the day, often expended and discarded like a paper cup, having exhausted its sales potential, Traditional styling has lasted almost four decades with minor innovations, now more solidly entrenched than ever in the Southeast.
"Followers attribute its longstanding success to a clean and uncluttered look, maintained in the face of broadside challenges. Others say it just happened to be the best idea of the time, conducive to the climate, atmosphere, and thinking of the New South. A third view points to the fact that it was created and nursed along by young men who styled and restyled it themselves.
"There's validity in all three arguments, for the fundamental characteristics of Traditional Clothing is simple standardization. Not only the form but the details are stock items, beginning with the lean and young look that embodies straight lines, unpadded shoulders, and a soft, relaxed shaping.
"The basic silhouette remains the same and in the purest sense it is accessorized with oxford cloth shirts that have soft rolling collars and long points, three-inch repp ties and more often than not wingtip brogue shoes or moc-toe slip-ons.
"THAT'S TRADITIONAL styling today, not always this prescribed formula that has become the stock-in-trade for young Americans.
"The look, basically its present form, originated shortly after World War I in New England colleges and universities by young men of wealth, who wanted to shake themselves free of "college boy" suits which had gravitated from overpadded styles in the 1880s to the skin-tight jobs in the early 1900s.
"CONTRARY to many popular misconceptions of the day, it was not the masses, the middle-income group or the lower-end students who made this style go. It took money to bring it home, make it, and wear it. After that it became another story.
"So, there is no real reason to believe that those affluent Ivy collegians who used their dads' bankrolls to go abroad for the summer with the varsity crews and tennis teams to compete against Oxford and Cambridge had anything in mind other than a good time. Bringing back styling ideas for new clothes was certainly not a matter of grave concern.
"HOWEVER, one look at what British men were wearing stirred an excitement within themselves that never quite quenched itself. The yen to be different, look different and having the money to do it sowed the seed that gradually evolved into Ivy League styling.
"Over there the English were wearing short two-button jackets with rounded fronts, broad shoulders and as often as not peaked lapels. (Rather different for the times.) This, combined with elephantine "Oxford Bags" (trousers that were 21 to 23 inches wide), plus-six knickers (so-called because the drape of the leg extended fully six inches below the knee), set the stage for the beginning of Traditional clothing in this country.
"AND IT was various interpretations of the English Look that gradually became a single look. Those coming home brought foreign clothes with them, took them to tailors, pulled them apart then sewed them back into an American adaptation. The look was styled, restyled, modified, and remodified and eventually, probably as much due to the
Depression as anything else, worked its way into a version of the Traditional Look as it is known today.
"Amazingly enough, once an identity was established, it held firm. Unlike some of its counterparts, Ivy never yielded to a passing fancy. Despite efforts to debase, abort, and bastardize it, Ivy League styling remains the most-wanted, most-worn, and most talked-about look in the land.
"THIS IS NOT to infer the soft-shoulder look has always enjoyed unprecedented popularity. It hasn't. It came from the families of the rich, which ruled out the masses immediately, thereby making its rise more slowly than would be the case today. But by the same token it was building a hard core of dedicates who would not compromise for less.
"As time tells, its biggest stronghold during the past 20 years has been in the Carolinas, often called "The Island of Natural Shoulder History," largely because pockets of Traditional fanciers remained there during periods of quick-changing styles wars.
"NEXT: Traditional Develops Despite Obstacles"
Quoted material used under a Creative Commons non-commercial license.
To be continued....