Men's Clothing Forums banner
21 - 32 of 32 Posts
+1 on no synthetic starch. As a note, synthetic doesn't seem to wash out thoroughly in commercial machines, according to the manager of my local cleaner's establishment. Therefore if you DO you synthetic, you should wash them yourself prior to having them laundered. My past experience with commercial cleaners caused me to wash my shirts beforehand years ago. I always opt for no starch. I have found there's always enough residual starch in the press to give a crisp feel to my shirts w/o starch. Of course that's merely my personal experience...
 
When I first started working, I opted for medium starch, because I wanted the crisp, military look in my shirts. This caused me to go through shirts at an extraordinary rate. The would eventually get holes in them at the creases.

For a number of years I used light startch, which is a compromise between short life and having a crisp shirt.

At the moment I am mostly wearing non-iron shirts from Nordstrom and BB and doing them myself at home--no starch.

I think it comes down to personal preference, but I have found that both starch and commercial laundering, either alone or in combination, are bad for your shirts.
 
Commercial laundering is only bad for your shirts if you use a sh*tty commercial laundry. Which, unfortunately, most people do. You get what you pay for.
 
I've been a medium-starch guy since 1982. I have not once experienced any accelerated wear (comparing them to my sport shirts, which I have never starched), and not once have I had a shirt "ruined" by starch. (I have had commercial launderers break buttons, but you didn't ask about that.)

Try light, medium, no starch, and see what you prefer.

Good luck,
Don
 
Don: Your laundry probably uses the natural wheat starch Stu was talking about, in that case. Even if it is better than synthetic starch, it still makes a shirt stiff. That's not a look I prefer, personally.
 
Response to Georgetown08:

Here are 2 "quick read" blog posts to aid you in selecting a true quality commercial shirt laundry....

Blog post: Your shirt laundry bill of rights

Blog link: https://www.ravefabricare.com/true-quality-cleaning/2010/4/20/your-shirt-laundry-bill-of-rights.aspx

Blog post: A true quality cleaner's shirt laundry standards

Blog link: https://www.ravefabricare.com/true-...uality-cleaning/2010/6/29/a-true-quality-cleaner's-shirt-laundry-standards.aspx

If you don't find a shirt laundry that meets or exceeds all these standards, go with the local cleaner that meets the majority of these standards.

Warning: Don't take the cleaner at his/her word. First, educate yourself about the specific standards identified above and then -- and only then -- question/interrogate the cleaner (preferably the owner or manager) in person. I'll bet that you'll find that the chasm between the verbal product explained to you and the actual product delivered to you will be as wide as the Grand Canyon.
 
I know this is an older thread and I am late to the party, but I thought it might be interesting to revive since I am moving toward NO IRON shirts, but have a few that do require ironing, and IMO, starch.

I have a few Ike Behar, one Polo and an older Lands End that I do starch. While I could probably do without in a pinch for the Polo and the Lands End, the Behar's are really dreadful without starch. I've tried lightly starching them, but it does not seem to do the job well enough for a crisp, clean collar and cuff, not to mention the body of the shirt. The collars look awful without starch. I frequently do medium starch on these.

For No-Iron shirts, I have had really great luck with Eddie Bauer, although I do not care for the cut. Out of the dryer, these shirts look like they have had heavy starch.
 
21 - 32 of 32 Posts